请输入或粘贴题目内容
搜题
拍照、语音搜题，请扫码下载APP
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
Recently, he has lost all his ______ at cards.
A) wage and saving B) wages and saving
C) wage and savings D) wages and savings
答案
更多“Recently, he has lost all his ______ at cards. A) wage and saving B) wages and saving C) w”相关的问题
第1题
A court-martial has but recently decided to acquit him.
A．declare he is not guilty
B．pardon him
C．condemn him
D．persecute him
第2题
What does he say about how the situation has developed recently？
A．Demand for consultants has increased.
B．There are more specialised services available.
C．The cost of consultancy has been reduced.
第3题
Why does Stephen Tanaka mention his work in Los Angeles？
A．He has more experience than the minimum amount required.
B．He met Betty Kang once at his office there.
C．He needs more advice about a project he is doing.
D．He is not sure if his background is appropriate.
第4题
In the second paragraph, the author seems to
A．believe the black leadership in Los Angeles should be responsible.
B．praise Mr. Hayes for some brilliant points he has brought up.
C．associate the Black political leadership' operation with Mr. Hayes's.
D．blame Mr. Hayes for his alleged racism of some selfish agendas.
第5题
A．Y
B．N
C．NG
第6题
A．To be close to where he lives.
B．He wants more responsibility.
C．He needs more money for he has recently bought a new house.
D．He wants a job that challenges him.
第7题
But in the months since then that support has come into question—and the damage has become real. Washington's reaction to the incident has created an atmosphere of suspicion, which, coupled with efforts to restrict scientific interchange and reduce funds for key research, threaten the essence of the lab—its ability to provide the kind of science-based security that has made it a national treasure.
Los Alamos burst upon the national consciousness on Aug 6, 1945, the day it was announced that the atomic weapon dropped on Hiroshima had been developed by scientists working at the lab under the direction of Robert Oppenheimer. The secret of their success was an almost magical mix of three key ingredients: the quality and dedication of the researchers, an open scientific environment that promote collaboration and Oppenheimer's brilliant leadership.
That excellence, openness and leadership have largely been maintained in the ensuing 54 years under the enlightened management of the University of California. During the cold war, when national security demanded that we have a competitive edge over the Soviets in nuclear weapons and weapons-related research, Los Alamos led the way. When it became evident that science-based national security depended on world leadership in science, the lab rose to the challenge. It developed an outstanding program to attract the best young researchers and established world-class trans-disciplinary centers for pure and applied scientific research. Indeed, what brought me to Los Alamos was the new Institute for Complex Adaptive Matter, established to work on what promises to be the most exciting science of the new millennium— the search for the higher organizing principles in nature that govern emergent behavior. in matter.
But in the past six months members of Congress and the Washington bureaucracy have put the scientific environment at Los Alamos seriously at risk. With the laudable goal of improving the security of classified research, they have attempted to impose inefficient micromanagement strategies while decreasing funding for vital research. As Sen. Pete Domenici, Republican of New Mexico, wrote recently to a Horse colleague, "The House action is irresponsible." The damage, he said, "would be as serious and more assured than the suspected damage that may have been caused by Wen Ho Lee."
Some of that damage has already been done. By my count there's been a 60 percent drop in the number of top researchers accepting postdoctoral fellowships at the lab. Promising young staffers are leaving for university and industry jobs, while leading university scientists have refused to be considered for key administrative positions at Los Alamos. Then, too, there's the loss of the young scientist from China who wanted to come to the lab to work with me this fall. Despite his outstanding record of scientific publication and glowing letters of recommendation, I felt obligated to discourage him from entering the postdoctoral competition. In the current atmosphere, I felt his every move would be monitored. But I wonder whether we've lost a chance to attract to America a major contributor to science—and a potential Nobel laureate.
Washington must never forget that science is done by scientists, not by computers. It is vital to build security barriers in physical space and cyberspace to protect classified information. But science is not don
A．he appreciated its scientific environment
B．he esteemed its distinguished scientists and treasured their accomplishments
C．it obtained support from Washington
D．its leaders were all able to cope with the potential damage to its programs.
第8题
听力原文：M: I met Sam on the street today.
W: Really？ Did he say something about his sister？
M: Yes. She ought to be leaving New York very soon, because her husband has taken a job in Los Angeles.
What do we know about Sam？
A．His sister will leave for New York.
B．His sister will leave for Los Angeles.
C．He will leave New York.
第9题
What can be concluded from the last paragraph？
A．LBL recently stopped the testing.
B．The privacy of genetic information can not be guaranteed.
C．The information must be put to some incredibly harmful use.
D．A San Francisco lawyer has tried to sue the lab for civil rights violations, but he isn't successful.
第10题
听力原文：M: Have you seen Edward recently？
W: Yes, I saw him at the downtown supermarket last week. He said his mother was going to London to see his elder sister.
Q: What can we learn from the conversation？
(3)
A．The woman met Edward at the supermarket this week.
B．Edward's mother was going to Paris.
C．Edward has an elder sister.
D．Edward's mother has lived with his elder sister for a long time.
