题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
[主观题]
If the purchaser has been given a purchase allowance, the amount of allowance should be de
bited to purchase return account.
A．正确
B．错误
答案
查看答案
重要提示：请勿将账号共享给其他人使用，违者账号将被封禁！
查看《购买须知》>>>
请输入或粘贴题目内容
搜题
拍照、语音搜题，请扫码下载APP
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
A．正确
B．错误
答案
更多“If the purchaser has been given a purchase allowance, the amount of allowance should be de”相关的问题
第1题
Even【C6】______the purchaser probably does not know why he or she bought something，the manufacturers【C7】______．Manufacturers have analyzed the business of【C8】______and buying．They know all the different motives that influence a consumer's purchase—some rational and【C9】______emotional．Furthermore，they
take advantage of this【C10】______.
Why【C11】______so many products displayed at the checkout counters in grocery stores？ The store management has some good【C12】______. By the time the customer is【C13】______to pay for a purchase, he or she has already made rational. thought-out decisions【C14】______what he or she needs and wants to buy. The【C15】______
feels that he or she has done a good job of choosing the items. The shopper is especially vulnerable at this point. The【C16】______of candy, chewing gum, and magazines are very attractive. They persuade the purchaser to buy something for emotional, not【C17】______motives. For example, the customer neither needs nor plans to buy candy. but while the customer is standing, waiting to pay money, he or she may suddenly decide to buy【C18】______
This is exactly【C19】______the store and the manufacturer hope that the customer will【C20】______
The customer follows his or her plan.
【C1】
第2题
What is NOT mentioned as a requirement to return a product to Ellington Tools？
A．The customer"s name
B．Telephone numbers
C．A note explaining the problem
D．The address
第3题
Turning Brownfields into Greenbacks
Inactive industrial sites are transforming into productive facilities.
Brownfields are industrial sites whose future use is restricted because of real or perceived pollution. The number of brownfield sites tins grown exponentially during the, past 25 years. The growth curve has reached epidemic proportions-as many as 650,000 brownfield sites exist in the United States today.
Both the public and private sectors realize the problem cannot continue to grow unchecked.
More of the impetus for redevelopment comes from state and local governments, which is not surprising since the brownfield epidemic directly affects thousands of U.S. communities. Many of these impacts are so serious that they threaten fiscal and social health of communities. Brownfield sites frequently result in a decreased tax base, urban blight, loss of infrastructure, suburban sprawl, the depletion of farmland and a loss of employment opportunities. State and local governments are more directly affected by these problems than their federal counterpart.
Although the impact is felt most strongly at the state and local levels, federal legislation is largely responsible for the brownfield phenomenon. In particular, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act's (CERCLA) onerous (繁重的) provisions have induced thousands of property owners, lenders and prospective purchasers to shun industrial property.
Theoretically, various provisions allow owners and lenders to avoid liability. Unfortunately, two of the primary ways to avoid liability are fraught with difficulty. Both the innocent landowner defence and the security interest exemption (免除) contain ambiguous language that is troubling to the members of the regulated community they were designed to protect.
The ambiguity, coupled with CERCLA's draconian liability scheme, has created a vacuum. Existing owners, prospective purchasers and lenders have become alert to industrial properties. Hundreds of thousands of moderately troubled properties sit idle because of the threat of CERCLA liability. These sites constitute the nation's approximately 650,000 brownfields. Until recently, prospective purchasers, lenders and tenants have had no reason to risk CERCLA liability by becoming involved in brownfield sites-but things are beginning to change. Federal and state governments have taken steps to encourage private parties to revitalize brownfields. An important plank in both federal and state programmes are provisions that limit owner and lender liability.
Federal Initiatives
The federal government has revised its policy on prospective purchaser agreements—contracts between the EPA and buyers of contaminated sites. The EPA originally published its Prospective Purchaser Guidance in 1989. At that time its policy was to avoid entanglements in what it viewed as private real estate deals. Since then, the number of inactive industrial sites has increased dramatically. State and local governments across the country complained loudly about the impact the sites were having on the economic and social health of their communities. The EPA now makes it easier for prospective purchasers to quantify their cleanup obligations by executing a prospective purchaser agreement.
Other important initiatives included in EPA's Brownfield Action Agenda were the Underground Storage Tank Lender Liability Rule and Owners of Property Containing Contaminated Aquifers Guidance.
State Initiatives
Many states have enacted Voluntary Cleanup Programmes (VCPs), designed to encourage the reuse of dormant industrial sites. Most VCPs offer mechanisms that limit owner liability for those not contributing to the sites' environmental problems.
Some VCPs allow regulators to enter into covenants not to sue, which provides owners with the abili
A．Y
B．N
C．NG
第4题
&8226;Write a 120-140-word reply to the buyer using the letter and your notes.
&8226;Do not include your address.
Dear Sophia.
It was good to see you again last week and we are delighted that your silk blouse will be included in our winter catalog. —We are delighted, too.
As promised, listed below are the points agreed at the meeting:
1. The contract is for the Ella range of silk blouses in three colors. —in six colors, which three colors do they want？
2. You will grant us exclusive import rights for the blouses in the UK.
3. The quantity will be 5.000 pieces, with a further option of 3,000. —We agreed 4.000？
4. The price per piece will be $5.65 for the first 5,000. You will confirm the price for the optional 3,000 pieces, —$5.25 for the optional pieces
5. Payment will be made by letter of credit.
6. The initial order will be ready by August 1st. 20--. —15th at the earliest
I trust you will find this in order. I look forward to your written confirmation in due course.
Best regards.
Stephanie Ho
Chief Purchaser
第5题
The purchaser wanted the equipment ______ by Monday morning.
A．delivered
B．delivering
C．will be delivered
D．must be delivered
第6题
A．The purchaser should seek reimbursement from that independent dealer.
B．The purchaser should report the independent dealer to the authorities.
C．The purchaser should still forward the product directly to the MSR Product Service Center.
D．The purchaser should return the product to the dealer for forwarding to MSR.
第7题
Who supermarkets basket？（）
A．The shopper
B．The cashier
C．The customer
D．The purchaser
第8题
Where does the woman suggest that the man get change？
A．from a machine
B．at the bookstore
C．from the purchaser
第9题
A．prepared
B．replaced
C．consumed
D．revised
第10题
When can the purchaser get 30% credit toward a new pair of sneakers？
A．One month after purchase.
B．When the guaranty expires and the manufacturer admits there is a defect in workmanship.
C．Two years after purchase.
D．Before the guaranty expires only.
