请输入或粘贴题目内容
搜题
拍照、语音搜题，请扫码下载APP
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
What is Susan Gates' opinion of the research work carried out in higher education？
A．It ought to benefit the economy more.
B．It is a direct result of links with business.
C．It has made British companies more competitive.
答案
更多“What is Susan Gates' opinion of the research work carried out in higher education？A．It oug”相关的问题
第1题
Susan Gates says that work experience for students
A．enables them to decide what they want to do.
B．provides industry with a flexible workforce.
C．helps them to improve their job prospects.
第2题
What does Susan Gates say about numeracy？
A．Top organisations train staff to work quickly with numbers.
B．Most graduates are not confident with mathematics,
C．Top employees are good with figures.
第3题
Susan Gates says that the worlds of business and higher education should try to
A．invest more money in research.
B．share their expertise in more ways.
C．improve the way they deal with change.
第4题
Susan Gates thinks that the committee should include Robertson's because
A．half of all graduates find jobs in retailing.
B．the views of non-specialist employers need to be represented.
C．it had more experience of employing graduates than IT companies.
第5题
Susan Gates thinks that small businesses
A．want graduates who need little training.
B．cannot attract as many graduates as large organisations.
C．need graduates with specialist skills.
第6题
Susan Gates says an important finding of the committee was that
A．employers need graduates with skills in key areas.
B．an increasing number of graduates had good IT skills.
C．the demands of the workplace were unlikely to change.
第7题
Woman: Well, although most graduates still enter the teaching profession, an increasing number are employed by the business community - this is a major destination for new graduates. So it's only natural that we should want to have a say in higher education, the courses that are being offered, and so on.
Man: And why do you think the supermarket chain, Robertson's, needed to be represented on the government committee？
Woman: Well, about 50% of jobs that come onto the market don't require a specific degree, so they're known as non-specialist. This area's made up mostly of the service and retail sectors, with the retail sector alone accounting for 11% of graduate jobs. The high-tech industries, for example, IT and manufacturing, were already represented on the committee, and we thought that the opinions of the non-specialist employer, like Robertson's, should also be taken into account.
Man: What about the findings of the committee？ What was important to you there？
Woman: Well, firstly, that employers are looking for more than a body of knowledge. In today's world, the knowledge that a student gains has a short life span - it won't necessarily be relevant in 20 years' time. The committee recognised that higher education needs to take on board the fact that employers are looking for important, universal skills - in particular, those of communication, numeracy and IT.
Man: So what role do these skills have？
Woman: Well, take numeracy. The sort of people who reach the upper levels of organisations are all highly numerate. They have the ability to work with numbers at a very sophisticated level. So it's important that people can understand numbers and spot a mistake very, very quickly - even if there are a lot of noughts at the end.
Man: What other findings of the committee were important to you？.
Woman: Another finding was recognising the importance of work experience. I think it's true to say that graduates with work experience are much more likely to get a job than those without. At Robertson's we employ 25,000 students throughout the country and we're looking to increase that. We need people with experience of working with others - this makes a big difference. Oh, and the third important finding was recognising the importance of applied research. One problem is the gap between the discovery of certain innovations and actually putting them into practice. That's where, as a country, we don't do as well as some of our competitors. We've got a wonderful record for pure research but it isn't translated into economic growth. That's where we need to build better links between business and industry, and higher education.
Man: And do you think these findings are equally important for small businesses？
Woman: Yes, even more so. Small businesses don't have time to train people to the extent that large organisations do. It's particularly important to them that graduates have the skills to go into the workplace and make a contribution right from the start. I think the key skills that we've already talked about, together with work experience, are very helpful in that situation.
Man: And finally, what should the business community and the world of higher education be aiming for in the future？
Woman: We need to work more in partnership and that requires effort, I think, on both sides. Business leaders could invest more time in higher education, for example sitting on higher education councils, collaborating on research. Some of this goes on already, but more links are needed. And while business solutions don't apply exactly to higher education, we still have a lot to offer in terms of the management of change.
Man: Susan Gates - thank you for coming to the studio to talk to us.
？You will hear an interview with Susan Gates, Director of Human Resources Policy at Robertson's,
A．business needs to compete with teaching as a graduate career choice.
B．many courses are not vocational enough.
C．many graduates enter the world of business.
第8题
Martin White, correspondent: I heard the government planned that Microsoft would have to come up with the details of this breakup itself, how to divide its people, its-property, its cash into two still very powerful pieces.
To accomplish the breakup, Microsoft would have to sell of about half its assets to create two companies. One would control most of Microsoft software, including Word, Excel and Internet Explorer. The other company would consist mostly of Windows operating system. But only one can keep the name of Microsoft. The other company would become completely independent.
For the first 10 years, the two companies would not be allowed to recombine. And Microsoft's top executives, including Bill Gates, could own stock of only one of them. The result, said Joel Klein, antitrust chief of the Justice Department, would be an exciting, and innovative set of new products with more choices and lower prices for America's consumers.
17 of the 19 states that sued along with the government signed on to the plan, but two states, Ohio and Illinois, dissented, asking that Microsoft be left intact but ordered to change its anti-competitive behavior.
For Microsoft, the breakup plan was not a surprise. Today Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates promised a long court fight and predicted a victory. He said he didn't believe the courts would uphold these radical regulatory suggestions which would hurt consumers and undermine the high technology economy.
Even if the court accepts the government's breakup plan. Microsoft would remain intact as it appeals, and that would take years. But government also asks the court to impose immediate restrictions on the company's business practice even as the court battle drags on.
Anchor: Thanks very much, Martin White in Washington. So the government has won the first battle to prove that' Microsoft's size and power are problem. But it's not clear at all if breaking up the software colossal would make things any better for consumers. Here's our correspondent, Susan Kelley.
Susan Kelley, correspondent: There's no consensus today that breaking up Microsoft would be good for consumers. For one thing, they could end up paying more for Microsoft products. Two companies mean two of everything, including two manufacturing operations.
An industrial analyst: If you run two separate, distinct companies, you lose your economy of scale. That's gonna increase cost for running the company that will ultimately be passed to consumer.
Susan Kelley: There's also no agreement now on whether breaking up Microsoft would improve the quality of products available to consumers. Some said if Microsoft was forced to share its unique code that operates Windows, competitors would be able to make better products to go with Windows. What would it be, though, is a lot of companies deciding to write competitive products because they now think the playing field is level. Others claim that progress in bringing new products to market will slow if the Microsoft brain trust is split in two.
An industrial analyst: There's a lot of cohesion that takes place by working as one solid entity rather than a separate distinct group of companies.
Susan Kelley: As for competitors eager for a breakup, they will still find themselves facing formidable foes. Microsoft is by far the Number One company. If you split it in two, it will be the Number One and Number Two software companies in the world.
Bottom line: Plenty of reasons to wonder if the government's proposal to brea
A．Microsoft used computer systems to win competition.
B．Microsoft was broken up earlier this month because of the rapid growing broadband market.
C．Microsoft broke anti-trust law by using its monopoly in the market.
第9题
What is the cause of the stampede？
A．Insufficient gates to the concert hall.
B．Unreserved seat tickets.
C．Unpunctuality of the ticket office workers.
D．The lack of policeman to keep order.
第10题
What might be the title of the passage？
A．Tragedy in Human History.
B．Locked Gates and Timber Stand Create Death Trap.
C．Fire in the Bradford Theatre.
D．Football Causes Great Disaster.
