首页 > 外语类考试> 在职申硕英语

网友您好，请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目：

请输入或粘贴题目内容搜题

搜题

拍照、语音搜题，请扫码下载APP

题目内容（请给出正确答案）

[主观题]

In 1960, the court ruled that Alabama State College______.A．had no right to expel the stud

In 1960, the court ruled that Alabama State College______.

A．had no right to expel the students

B．was justified to have expelled the students

C．shouldn"t interfere with students" daily life

D．should support civil rights demonstrations

答案

查看答案

发布时间：2019-07-12

更多“In 1960, the court ruled that Alabama State College______.A．had no right to expel the stud”相关的问题

第1题

What can we assume from the passage？A．Most people who feel they have been wronged have a r

What can we assume from the passage？

A．Most people who feel they have been wronged have a ready remedy in court of law.

B．Many people would like to bring a case to court,but are unable to because of time required.

C．The judicial system in the United States is highly acclaimed for its efficiency.

D．Pretrial conferences will someday probably have replaced trials completely.

点击查看答案

第2题

Same-sex couples Paul Katami （L), Jeff Zarillo （2nd L), and Kris Perry （2nd R) and Sandy S

Same-sex couples Paul Katami (L), Jeff Zarillo (2nd L), and Kris Perry (2nd R) and Sandy Stier pose for photographs before the start of their trial in San Francisco, California January 11, 2010. California's ban on gay marriage goes to trial on Monday in a federal case that plaintiffs hope to take all the way to the US Supreme Court and overturn bans throughout the nation.

Two Californian men challenging a ban on same-sex marriage on Monday said they had been a couple for nine years and felt like third-class citizens, leading them to launch the federal case which could set a national precedent. The men and a lesbian couple unable to marry in California hope to take their case against the state' s Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage all the way to the US Supreme Court and to overturn bans throughout the nation. A loss in the top court, two ranks above the action in the case which began on Monday, would seriously undermine efforts to win gay marriage rights in state courts.

The United States is divided on same-sex marriage. It is legal in only five states, though most of those, and the District of Columbia, approved it last year. Approval of Prop 8 in November 2008 was a sweet victory for social conservatives in a state with a liberal, trend-setting reputation, and maintained the steady success they have scored on the issue at the ballot box. Where it is legal, gay marriage has been championed by courts and legislatures, not voters.

"I don't think of myself as a bad person," said Paul Katami, describing the persecution he felt from a media campaign warning California parents to "protect" their children by voting against same-sex unions in the 2008 poll. He and his would-be husband, Jeffrey Zarrillo, described slights in gay life that ranged from being pelted with rocks and eggs in college to the awkwardness of checking into a hotel and not being able to clarify the relationship. "Being able to call him my husband is so definitive," Katami said. "There is no subtlety to it. It is absolute. " Gays and lesbians have nearly equal rights under domestic partnership laws, but the two men said that left them feeling second-or third-class citizens and they wanted to be married to have kids. "We hear a lot of 'What's the big deal？' The big deal is creating a separate category for us," Katami said.

Gay rights lawyers in the case describe their battle as a continuation of the fight against racist laws stopping whites and blacks from marrying. Marriage is a fundamental constitutional right, and in addition gays and lesbians deserve special protection from discrimination, they say.

What is current situation of the nation on same-sex union？

点击查看答案

第3题

Before the 1970s, college students were treated as children. So many colleges ran in loco

parentis system. " In loco parentis" is a Latin term, meaning " in the place of a parent. " It describes when someone else accepts responsibility to act in the interests of a child. This idea developed long ago in British common law to define the responsibility of, teachers toward their students. For years, American courts upheld in loco parentis in cases such as Gott versus Berea College in 1913. Gott owned a restaurant off campus. Berea threatened to expel students who ate at places not owned by the school. The Kentucky high court decided that in loco parentis justified that rule. In loco parentis meant that male and female college students usually had to live in separate buildings. Women had to be back at their dorms by ten or eleven on school nights. But in the 1960s, students began to protest rules and restrictions like these. At the same time, courts began to support students who were being punished for political and social dissent. In 1960, Alabama State College expelled six students who took part in a civil rights demonstration. They sued the school and won. After that, it became harder and harder to defend in loco parentis. At that time, students were not considered adults until 21. Then, in 1971, the 24th amendment to the Constitution set the voting age at eighteen. So in loco parentis no longer really applied. Slowly, colleges began to treat students not as children, but as adults. Students came to be seen as consumers of educational services. Gary Dickstein, an assistant vice president at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio, says in loco parentis is not really gone. It just looks different. Todays parents, he says, are often heavily involved in students lives. They are known as "helicopter parents". They always seem to hover over their children. Gary Dickstein says these parents are likely to question decisions, especially about safety issues and grades. They want to make sure their financial investment is not being wasted.

Before the 1970s, many colleges ran in loco parentis system because______.

A．they could take the place of the students" parents

B．parents asked them to do it for the interests of their children

C．this was a tradition established by British colleges

D．college students were regarded as too young to be treated as adults

点击查看答案

第4题

More than 30,000 drivers and passengers who seat in the front of the vehicles are killed o

r seriously injured each year. At a speed of only 30 miles per hour it is the same as falling from a third-floor building. Wearing a seat belt saves lives: it reduces your chance of death or serious injury by more than half.

Therefore drivers or front seat passengers over 14 in most vehicles must wear a seat belt. If you do not, you will be fined up to ￡ 50.It will not be up to the drivers to make sure you wear your belt. But it will be the driver's responsibility to make sure that children under 14 do not ride in the front unless they are wearing a seat belt of some kind.

However, when you're reversing your car, you do not have to wear a seat belt; or you are making a local delivery or collection using a special vehicle; r if you have a valid medical certificate which excuses you from wearing it. Make sure these circumstances apply to you before you decide not to wear your seat belt. Remember that you may be taken to court for not doing so, and you may be fined if you cannot prove that you have been excused from wearing it.

How many people in front of the vehicles are killed or seriously injured every year？

A．30,000.

B．60,000.

C．Approximately 30,000.

D．Above 30,000.

点击查看答案

第5题

安特生（1874～1960）

点击查看答案

第6题

______ that the trade between the two countries reached its highest point.A．During the 196

______ that the trade between the two countries reached its highest point.