首页 > 外语类考试> 大学英语四级

网友您好，请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目：

请输入或粘贴题目内容搜题

搜题

拍照、语音搜题，请扫码下载APP

题目内容（请给出正确答案）

[主观题]

Immigrant groups, when they got settled down in the United States, still have had their ow

n sense of self-identity because ______.

A．their foods are easily identified among all the foods Americans eat

B．their foods stand out in sharp contrast to foods of other countries

C．they know pretty well what elements of American food are of their own countries' origin

D．they know pretty well how their foods contribute to American cuisine

答案

查看答案

发布时间：2019-09-20

更多“Immigrant groups, when they got settled down in the United States, still have had their ow”相关的问题

第1题

______ contribute to Americans’ international taste.A．The various immigrant groups in Amer

______ contribute to Americans’ international taste.

A．The various immigrant groups in America

B．The government's encouragement

C．The young people's changes of taste

D．The mass media ads

点击查看答案

第2题

The various immigrant groups in America contribute to Americans' international taste.A．YB．

The various immigrant groups in America contribute to Americans' international taste.

A．Y

B．N

C．NG

点击查看答案

第3题

From the third paragraph, we can know ______.A．few immigrant groups try to maintain their

From the third paragraph, we can know ______.

A．few immigrant groups try to maintain their own cultural tradition, language, and religious practices

B．some groups, such as the Huguenots French Protestants) who immigrated during the colonial period, did not assimilate within one or two generations

C．others, such as the German and Irish immigrants of the 19th century, still maintain some characteristics of their traditional cultures

D．all the immigrants have absorbed in the beliefs and standards of the dominant society

点击查看答案

第4题

In less than three decades "multiculturalism" has become a word immediately recognizable

by policy 【M1】______ makers, social critics, academics and the general public in Western industrial countries. It emphasizes that acknowledging the existence of ethnic diversity and ensure the rights of individuals to retain their 【M2】______ culture should go hand in hand with enjoying full access to participate in constitutional principles and 【M3】______ commonly shared values prevailed in the society. By 【M4】______ acknowledging the rights of individuals and groups and ensuring their equitable access to society, advocates of multiculturalism also maintain that such a policy benefits both individuals and the large society 【M5】______ by reducing pressures for social conflict based on disadvantage and inequality. They also argue that multiculturalism is enrichment for the society as a whole. The adoption of multicultural policy models is 【M6】______ initially inspired by a desire to address the issue of how to integrate immigrant ethnic minority. The 【M7】______ experiences of those limited number of countries of Canada, Australia and Sweden which have explicitly espoused multiculturalism as a policy response to ethnic diversity have indicated that while the policy is certainly uncontested it has, nevertheless, shown 【M8】______ considerable durability. The application of any policy model will obviously be affected by the characteristics of the society which it operates. The attraction of 【M9】______ multiculturalism was its perceived ability to address policy issues associated with immigrant minority groups in a way that was consistent with special ideals 【M10】______ of a country.

【M1】

点击查看答案

第5题

A Society Without a Formal Authority In the seventeenth century, European soldiers wh

A Society Without a Formal Authority

In the seventeenth century, European soldiers who came across soreS'Indian groups in the western Great Lakes round that several native tdbes （部落） were living in the area without a formal leadership system. They appeared to be "quite fridendly with each other without a formal authority"

Not only did the Indians appear to lack a formal system.of authority, but they also deeply hated any efforts to control their actions. All members of the tribes knew what was required of them by lifelong （一生的） familiarity with the tasks of the area. These tasks tended to be simple, since the indians' rate of social change was slow. Thus, although subgroups such as soldiers had recognized leaders, no real authority was required.

Rather than giving direct orders （which were considered rough）, members of the tribes would arouse others to action by examples.

It would be difficult, if not impossible, to carry out such asystem in our own society.Most of us have grown up under one authority or another for as long as we can remember. Our parents, our teachers, our bosses, our government all have the recognized right under certain conditions to tell us what to do. The authority is so much a part of our culture that it is hard for us to imagine a workable society without it. We have been used to relying on authority to get things done and would probably be uncomfortable with the Indian methods of examples on a large scale.Of course, the major reason why the Indian system would not be suitable for us is that our society is too large. The number of tasks that various members of our scciety have to perform. often under tight time and resource limitations could not be treaed by the indian system. In modern societies, the formal authority system is necessary to achieve any social objectives.第 28 题 Which of the following statements about the European soldiers is correct？

A．They had no leaders.

B．They treated the Indian groups well.

C．They came across some Indian groups.

D．They found the Indian groups friendly to them.

点击查看答案

第6题

America is not the only country wrestling with immigration. As the Senate was passing its

version of an immigration bill, Spain was calling for European Union to help it stem a flood of migrants from west Africa to the Canary Island. The EU sent patrol boats and aircraft to the seas which thousands have crossed (and where hundreds have died in the hope of getting into Europe). Britain and France are reforming their immigration laws. Britain and Italy are fretting over the deportation of immigrant criminals. Six countries favour European "integration contracts"—tests of would—be citizens' knowledge of their host countries as a pre-condition for getting passports.

But if both sides of the pond are experiencing similar upheavals, there is a big difference between their debates. Americans are letting it all hang out. Tumultuous demonstrations clog the streets. Politicians, lobbyists and interest groups clog the talk shows. In Europe, debate does not grip countries in the same way. After second-generation immigrants staged their suburban car-flagrations in France last year, the prime minister weirdly downplayed the riots' significance. Questions about the impact of immigration merge into issues such as asylum, and even Islamist terror. Debate exists, but it is distorted and submerged.

"The big difference in the way Europeans and Americans look at immigration," argues Kathleen Newland of the Migration Policy Institute in Washiongton, DC, "springs from the fact that America protects its welfare system from immigrants but leaves its labour markets open, while the EU protects its labour markets and leaves it s welfare system open." Immigrants to Europe are welcomed with welfare benefits but cannot get jobs (their unemployment rate is far higher than average). America makes it easy even for illegal immigrants to get jobs but stops even legal ones claiming means-tested welfare benefits or subsidized housing.

The result is that in America political debate centers on illegal immigration, and there is no sense that legal immigrants impose burdens on others. In Europe things are different. There, even legal immigrants are often seen as sponging on others through welfare receipts; and the fact that some have taken jobs which would not otherwise be done so cheaply is forgotten. In Europe, says Danny Sriskandarajah of Britain's Institute for Public Policy Research, it is harder to talk about immigration as an economic issue. Instead, all migrants are caught in web of suspicion.

Politically, the debate is different, too. In America, immigration is a mainstream issue, and splits both parties, Republicans especially. Not so in Europe. With few exceptions, the parties most willing to raise immigration as a political issue lie outside the mainstream-notably (though not only) far-right parties such as France's National Front and the Danish People's Party. The Netherlands is an exception: there, the politics of immigration entered the mainstream after two critics of multiculturalism were murdered. Britain is a partial exception, too: both Labour and Conservatives have espoused the cause of immigration control. But for the most part, big parties of center-left and center-right have not made deep reform. of immigration a high priority.

Because immigration has been the preserve of the fringe, Europe's debate about it is bedeviled with accusations of racism (which does exist). Naturally, this harms those who want to impose controls: they are tainted by association. But paradoxically, it does not help those who back immigration and benefit from it either (such as employers of immigrant labour). Europe has no equivalent to the alliance of Senator John McCain and Ted Kennedy (usually political foes) who sponsored the Senate bill. Without a space in the political center for friends of immigration, public fears of immigration go unaddressed and unallayed.

And on the other side, there is less political

A．Six countries approve of the European "integration contracts".

B．Britain and France are amending their immigration laws.

C．Britain and Italy are tortured by the deportation of immigrant criminals.

D．Spain was trying to stop the pour of immigrant criminals from west Africa to its country.

点击查看答案

第7题

移入种 immigrant species

点击查看答案

第8题

In the community he had left, the immigrant usually had ______.

点击查看答案