Priests are usually unsuccessful in counseling troubled couples despite their ______.
第1题
Brian Harper says that priests ______.
A.are not vulnerable
B.are just normal people
C.do not have dilemmas
D.are usually kind
第2题
The Game of the Name
Here comes John Smith walking toward me. Even though he is but a passing acquaintance, the American greeting ritual demands that I utter a few words to reassure him of my good will. But what form. of ad- dress should I use? John? Smith? Dr. Smith? A decision such as this is usually made unconsciously.
As native speakers in the American speech community, we have grown up learning the rules of address at the same time that we were acquiring the grammatical rules of American - English. At first thought, it might seem a trivial pursuit to examine the ways in which we address one another. But forms of address re- veal many assumptions we make about memebers of our speech community.
Our initial decision about the appropriate address form. is based on relative ages. If the person being ad- dressed is a child, then almost all the rules that we have unconsciously assimilated can safely be ignored, and we use the simple formula First Name. The child, in turn, addresses an adult by using the formula Tihe plus Last Name.
But defining a "child" is not always easy. I address my son's roommate at college by FN, even though he is an adult under the law. I, too, have the relative age of a child to a 75 - year - old acquaintance who calls me Pete. Let us assume that John Smith' is not a child who can be addressed by FN but is either my contemporary or my elder. The next important determiner for the form. of address will then be the speech situation.
If the situation is a formal one, then I must disregard all other rules and use social Identity plus Last Name. John Smith will always be addressed as Dr. Smith (or sometimes simply as Doctor, with Last Name understood) in the medical setting of office or hospital. (I am allowed to call him if my status is at least as high as his or if we are friends outside of our social roles, but the rest of my utterance must remain respectful.)
We are also obliged to address certain other people by their social identity in formal situation: public officials (Congressman: Your Honor), educators (Professor or Doctor), leaders of meetings (Mr. Chairman ), Roman Catholic priests (Father Daily) and nuns (Sister Anna), and so forth. By the way, note the sexist distinction in the formulas for priests and nuns. The formula for a priest is Father plus Last Name, but for a nun it is Sister plus Religious Name (usually an FN).
Most conversations, however, are not carried on in formal speech situations, and so the basic decision is when to use FN to TLN. A social acquaintance or newly hired colleague of approximately the same age and rank is usually introduced on an FN basis. "Pete, I'd like you to meet Harvy. "Now a problem arises if both age and rank of cone of the parties are higher: "Pete, I'd like you to meet Attorney Brown."
Attorney Brown may, of course, at any time signal me that he is willing to suspend the rules of address and allow an FN basis. Such a suspension is his privilege to bestow, and it is usually handled humorously, with a remark like, “I answer quicker to Bruce.”
Complications arise when relative age and relative rank are not both the same. A young doctor who joins a hospital finds it difficult to address a much older doctor. They are equal in rank (and therefore FN should be used) but the great disparity in ages calls for TLN. In such cases, the young doctor can use the No - Name (NN) formula, phrasing his utterances adroitly to avoid using any term of address at all.
English is quite exceptional among the world's languages in this respect. Most European languages oblige the speaker to choose between the familiar and formal second person singular (as in the French tu and vous), as English once did when “thou” was in use.
This is the basic American system, but the rules vary according to speech situations, subtle friendship or kin relationships between the speakers, regions of
A.relative ages
B.speech situation
C.relative ranks
D.relative incomes
第3题
A.For their priests to live in.
B.As residences for spirits.
C.As a place to gather.
D.As a place for weddings, funerals and special events.
第4题
A.the Mayan numbers enabled the Mayan priests to study planets
B.the European countries had no interest in founding a calendar
C.the European calendars of the time probably were made by a guess work
D.the year was divided into 18 months of 20 days each with five days left over
第5题
There are the usual questions about coping with celibacy and the restrictions that this puts on personal relationships. But there is real curiosity, too, about why an "otherwise normal" person would take on such a life.
"There is a genuine interest in the whole area of spirituality and the spiritual life," Harper says, "The contrast has never been greater than it is now between the religious and secular paths. " Many young people head for a life in the church, he says, after attending Catholic schools where the emphasis is placed on religious observance, ritual and the importance of obedience and personal humility. But in today's world it is becoming increasingly difficult for such young people to ignore what is happening in the secular world behind the church. Many priests and nuns have left the safety of the ordered religious life in the past couple of decades. But they have not done so without a struggle. Harper can identify with the experience of those who leave.
"It is so much easier to join up than it is to quit," he says, "It's like in personal relationships, they're easy enough to get into, but extricating yourself from one that's not working or that you're not happy with can be very difficult indeed. "
Steven Mc Callanan, a parish priest, is frank about his life in church. He sums it up: "If you are prepared to see life in all its color then go ahead, take orders. But don't think it will be easy. I face problems every day. "
Harper believes the religious life attracts a true cross-section of people, from the extrovert to the shy and retiring, although many are drawn by the church's emphasis on ritual and performance. If one were to generalize, though, most priests have the kind of artistic temperaments that would "I know some brilliant men and women in the church, then I know some tried and disillusioned ones and some who are struggling with their own kind of personal demons," says Harper. He says it is a shame that the Catholic community has traditionally put priests on a pedestal, "up there with God", whereas in fact they are just like everyone else: flawed and vulnerable, make them good actors or performance poets-and social drinkers.
"Being a priest just happens to be a career, admittedly a specialized one and one that demands a certain range of qualities. But priests are just as frail and weak as the rest of us."
Harper has made a television programme about priests, monks and nuns in the Catholic Church. The message he gave to those who took part in his documentary was: "We are not trying to trip you up or make you appear strange or foolish. We are just trying to answer what we think are some generally asked questions about your attitudes, your dilemmas, and the kinds of lives you lead. "It makes fascinating viewing.
People are always curious about ______.
A.why a person would like to be priest
B.who would like to be priests
C.what is inside a church
D.what education priests may get
第6题
Which of the following statements is true?
A.The Spanish arrived in Mexico long before the Maya civilization.
B.Now, many of the ancient Mayan cities and temples can be visited by visitors.
C.The Mayan priests developed a system for measuring accurately.
D.In the 1500s the Maya left their villages and beautiful cities.
第7题
Harper has made a television program to ______.
A.raise questions about the Catholic Church
B.trip the audience up
C.make the Catholic Church appear interesting
D.answer the usual questions about priests and nuns
第8题
According to Paragraph 3, which of the following is NOT true?______.
A.In the past, bones might be used to decide why people fell ill.
B.In pre-industrial societies priests sometimes treated patients by singing.
C.Modern medicine is so complicated that sociology no longer has a place in it.
D.There were only two roles in an elementary medical system, the patient and the one who tried to cure him.
第9题
According to Paragraph 3, which of the following is NOT true?
A.In the past, bones might be used to decide why people fell ill.
B.In pre-industrial societies priests sometimes treated patients by singing.
C.Modern medicine is so complicated that sociology no longer has a place in it.
D.There were only two roles in an elementary medical system, the patient and the one who tried to cure him.
第10题
Which of the following details is NOT true?
A.The settlement in Orange Country exceeds the record payment of 85 million dollars.
B.More cases are threatening to bankrupt many dioceses.
C.The Roman Catholic Church in Los Angeles has reached a deal with nearly 100 people.
D.There are many cases as being abused by priests and other church employees in the United States.